Love, Sex & the Internet: Hipster Hooker with a Heart of Gold

By Esmerelda Smith

Let me state upfront: I have no problem sex workers and what they do. But I’ve got my knickers in a twist after reading an incendiary little piece of “investigative” journalism by Jessica Pilot over at Radar Magazine: Secrets of Hipster Hooker. Her article is not realistic and portrays prostitution in a caviler way as the hip, new, empowering thing that we ladies can do to assert our sexual independence & value within a society.

The idea that prostitution is a trend amongst the young, stylish and professionally successful bothers me profoundly. Amongst the things one considers before entering into the sex trade I fervently hope that the idea of “being hip” is not amongst the weighty considerations. The tone of her decision making is almost a slap in the face to women who are actually involved in the sex industry professionally.

“There are a lot of different kinds of experiences in the sex industry, and its unfortunate that the media is so obsessed with two extremes: high class call girls and drug addicted street workers,” says Audacia Ray of Waking Vixen.

The high class call girl vs. the street whore are diametric images which have been portrayed copiously in the media since before Heidi Fleiss or Pretty Woman were either part of our popular culture. As “edgy” as Ms. Pilot is trying to be her, in the end she is just telling a story which has already been told. Over and over again, it’s been told – so much so that people are tired of it.

Monica from $pread posted in response to the Radar piece about the fascination “young, hip, empowered” women currently have with being a call girl:

“But it seems to me that this attitude is less about empowerment and far more about impressing people: I'm so cool I have all these hooker friends, I'm so cool that I could make men pay me if I wanted, etc. It's just another way to quantify and assert one's value as a sexual being, and I don't see a lot of men joining in on it. So again, this article depresses me. It depresses me to think that sex work is treated as the last frontier of women who feel the need to prove that their looks and their sexual prowess have worth. You have worth, whether or not you're cashing in on it.

That pretty much sums it up, doesn’t it?

A commenter on the online version of the Radar article added:

“The whole scene seems like third wave feminism gone awry- though these women are taking advantage of the patriarchal shit in society; they are also reinforcing some fucked up ideas.”

It bears consideration that this is the kindest phrasing of one of the more intelligent members of the – erum – majority of the population will have for a piece illuminating rich white girls playing Heidi Fleiss wannabe dress-up. It bears consideration that many other people will categorize such behavior as morally wrong.

It should be of no shock that Ms. Pilot did not follow through on her appointment with her John:

A pudgy man with dark hair opens the door wearing a loose hotel bathrobe.  ”Violetta!" he says, extending his short, bushy arms and putting a hand on each side of my face. He looks at me for a moment, then gives me a kiss on both cheeks. "Come in, bella!"

I see that the covers are pulled back on the bed. A bottle of expensive champagne is nestled on the pillows. The man looks at me expectantly. I think about Kelly and try to imagine myself possessing her nerve and bravery. But it's not there.

"I have to go," I tell him. He looks confused—even a bit hurt. Hoping to change my mind, he hands me an envelope with his cash "gift" inside. It feels gloriously heavy. But I can't take it. I'm not even sure why, but I know I have to leave. I quickly turn and walk out while the john sputters a few words of protest. I switch off my phone, get a cab, go home, and run a bath. [Via Radar]

The speed with which Pilot goes from idolizing and wishing to emulate her call girl friends to reconfirming the societal message that prostitution is dirty and wrong nearly breaks the speed of light. In three brief paragraphs she leaves readers with the conclusion that you are either the Madonna OR the whore, and that there is no middle ground. This is not a better conclusion than one which equates being a call girl with being a celebrity. It’s a confusing betrayal of her thesis and one which leaves the reader rightly questioning any and all merit of this article

Many people have cried “shenanigans” to the voracity of the piece in its entirety. In a follow up post, Monica from $pread illuminates several glaring points that taken together are evidentiary enough for most to conclude that Pilot’s piece is falsified and was crafted as a huge publicity stunt designed to draw attention to the floundering Radar magazine and Ms. Pilot:

- Independent girls (especially those making well into 6 figures) are not going to start working for a woman who takes half of what they make, no matter how "super-rich" this madam promises her clients are.

- This same madam allegedly confesses her real name and occupation to Pilot; and, then invites Pilot into her home immediately after their first encounter and then suggests that she try working, which is a felony.

- She does all this after being explicitly told at the start that Pilot is a journalist.

Pilot pays the madam $2,000 for bailing out on the appointment, in spite of the fact that the madam would have no legal way of collecting the money, and Pilot, knowing the madam's real name, address, and straight job occupation, clearly has the upper hand. Frankly, given that dynamic, Pilot should have been the one extorting money. [Via $pread]

I don’t know that I necessarily believe that Pilot’s piece is completely a work of fiction; but, I do have to agree with a friend who said, “I think the article is stupid and shallow; and, I still wonder what exactly makes the women ‘hipsters?"’

Indeed that is a curious question: to me it reads like shallow, over privileged young women trying to rebel and be cool.

FOR THE RECORD: All the actual hipsters I know wear thrift store clothing, smell funky and hangout in dive bars drinking $2 PBR; as opposed to wearing Prada and frequenting tony clubs. The mere fact that Pilot categorizes her friends as “hipster hookers” is enough to make me raise an eyebrow and say “Oh, REALLY now?”

POSTED IN: SEX
Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:30 (GMT+00)
3 Responses
1.

I read the whole article, and I didn't buy any of it. It sounded like something the author cooked up after watching Secret Diary of a Call Girl. And, the fact she claims that she went back to the madam's house, and then paying her $2,000 was completely asinine (if this were even true). "Hipster Hookers" is a great name for a band, don't you think?

Colette
Wed, 03-Sep-2008 14:25 GMT
2.

Totally, Hipster Hookers would be a great name for a band. That's really the only thing of value one can take from Pilot's article, eh?

~Ese

Esemeralda
Wed, 03-Sep-2008 16:35 GMT
3.

The whole article reads like someone who's never actually done sex work, or even been in a position in which that would be a choice for them. It's insulting.

maria
Thu, 04-Sep-2008 00:34 GMT

Add Comment

Note: Your email address will be verified but will never be published on the site.

If you are a registered user, please Sign In.




The opinions expressed by the author and commenters are their own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BitchBuzz or any employer or organisation. The aforementioned are not responsible for the accuracy of content published.

social feed

@BitchBuzz: Marni for H&M is Almost Here! - from @jennifertrak on BitchBuzz Style http://t.co/nGQzgJQv
23 Feb @ 10:44 GMT

search



buzz we love

Bitchin' Lifestyle
Vikki Chowney
Bangs and a Bun
Vintage Patisserie
Pop Justice
The Other Woman
Pamflet
Gala Darling
Red Velvet
Shape What's to Come
Bird's Eye View
Gala Darling
Bake & Destroy
Kris Atomic
Mark Johns
Garfunkel & Oates
India Knight
Kate Nash
Erin Gibson
Sarah Lacy
Vegansaurus
The Boss of You
Meantime Brewery
Make and Do with Perri